Q&A: Alternative Kindergarten Programs


Do you have an alternative kindergarten program in Western MA to recommend? Leave a comment below and share your recommendation.

Lori Peters writes, “My son is kindergarten age next year and I am thinking about school options. I know that kindergarten isn’t mandatory in Massachusetts and I am wondering if anyone has tried an alternative program. Are there part-time kindergarten programs in the area? I work full-time so home schooling for that year isn’t a great option. I would love some feedback.”

  • Holly Alexander recommends, “Our son goes to the Greenfield Center School. It is full day, except on Wednesday, which is half day. It is as alternative as possible and a perfect fit for us.”
  • Christine Moynihan Huntley recommends,Mountain Brook Children’s Center has a kindergarten program (in South Deerfield). It is fantastic and science oriented. They have flexible schedules.”
  • Myssie Casinghino recommends,The Hill Institute in Florence has a half day option.”
  • Lyza May recommends, “You can do 5 mornings and 2-4 afternoons at The Common School in Amherst for kindergarten. We LOVE it.”
  • Katryna Nields recommends,Full Circle School in Bernardston is afternoons only, Monday thru Thursday. My friends there love it. Does Red Gate Farm (Buckland, MA) have options for you?”
  • Barbara Nichols Zaccheo recommends, “We love Bement School in Deerfield- very nurturing, educational and fun kindergarten.”
  • Lori Peters replies, “I will look into these. We are in Goshen so most are a hike. I wonder if there are any programs up here?”

[Photo credit: (ccl) Jack Amick]

Crisis in the Kindergarten: Why Children Need to Play in School

Testing of Kindergartners Is Out of Control, Says Children’s Advocacy Group in New Report

Photo credit: (ccl) Woodley Wonderworks

Photo credit: (ccl) Woodley Wonderworks

Studies show standardized tests and test prep are now daily activities in many kindergartens. Why? Molly Holloway, a mother of twin kindergartners in Bowie, Maryland, can’t understand why her children must take standardized tests every month in math, reading, social studies, and science.

“One of the teachers has told me that the kindergarten curriculum is what used to be the first-grade curriculum,” Holloway wrote. “What evidence do we have that this pushing is beneficial? While some children can handle the pressure, others cannot. One of my daughters struggles to keep up and hates school.”¹

A mother in Illinois writes, “In order to prepare kids ahead of time for the state tests, hard core curriculum must start in kindergarten. Our kids are not actually getting smarter. The scores are not increasing. And the rates of children with anxiety issues are increasing rapidly.”²

Recent studies in New York City and Los Angeles confirm what these and other parents have observed: standardized testing and test prep have become daily activities in many public kindergartens. Teachers say they are under pressure to get children ready for the third-grade tests. The 254 teachers surveyed in the studies said they spent an average of 20 to 30 minutes per day in test-related activity.

The findings are documented in a new report, Crisis in the Kindergarten: Why Children Need to Play in School (pdf), released on March 20, 2009 by the nonprofit Alliance for Childhood. The authors, Edward Miller and Joan Almon, say that kindergarten testing is “out of control.” (Available is an 8-page summary of the report (pdf), including recommendations for action)

High-stakes testing and test preparation in kindergarten are proliferating, as schools increasingly are required to make decisions on promotion, retention, and placement in gifted programs or special education classes on the basis of test scores. In New York City, for example, kindergarten children take a standardized I.Q. test to determine whether they qualify for “gifted and talented” classes. The city is also implementing a plan to test kindergarten, first-, and second-grade children as part of schools’ performance evaluations. The test scores are used to assign letter grades, A to F, to all of the city’s public schools. The grades are then used to determine rewards and punishments, including cash bonuses for teachers and principals and whether principals will be fired and schools shut down.

“Rigid testing policies do not make sense in early childhood education,” states the Alliance for Childhood report. “Standardized testing of children under age eight, when used to make significant decisions about the child’s education, is in direct conflict with the professional standards of every educational testing organization.”

Young children are notoriously unreliable test takers. They can do well one day and poorly on the same test on another day.

“A major problem with kindergarten tests is that relatively few meet acceptable standards of reliability and validity,” says the National Association for the Education of Young Children. “The probability of a child being misplaced is fifty percent—the same odds as flipping a coin. … Flawed results lead to flawed decisions, wasted tax dollars, and misdiagnosed children.”

The National Association of School Psychologists agrees, saying that “evidence from research and practice in early childhood assessment indicates that issues of technical adequacy are more difficult to address with young children who have little test-taking experience, short attention spans, and whose development is rapid and variable.”

It’s not just parents who are up in arms over the tests for tots. Anthony Colannino, a Waltham, Massachusetts elementary school principal, is upset that his kindergartners are now required to take fill-in-the-right-bubble tests. “Now we’re all the way down to 5- and 6-year-olds taking a pencil and paper test,” he told his local newspaper. “My students and others across the state are being judged on reading material above their grade level.”³

Read the rest of this entry »

%d bloggers like this: